Millions of Americans may now hold the right to Canadian citizenship β and don't know it. And thousands who received their certificates are now being told to surrender them. Attorney Terry Preshaw is ready to help.
One hour Β· Dual-licensed attorney Β· U.S. and Canadian immigration law since 1985
Photo: Terry T. Preshaw Β· Stawamus Chief, Squamish, BC
On the weekend of June 13β14, 2026, IRCC emailed an unknown number of Bill C-3 certificate holders β among roughly 4,075 individuals who had received Canadian citizenship certificates β demanding surrender of their certificates. As of today, this has become a national political and legal crisis with Parliamentary debate, a minister's public statement, and talk of class action litigation. Here is what you need to know.
NDP immigration critic Jenny Kwan sent an open letter to Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab demanding she reveal how many certificates were suspended and calling for an immediate halt to adverse action against affected holders. Kwan stated publicly that people are "contemplating launching a legal challenge and potentially a class-action lawsuit." Conservative immigration critic Michelle Rempel Garner also pressed the Minister in Question Period.
Minister Diab characterized the suspensions as affecting only "a limited number" of people and stated that having a Canadian ancestor does not automatically confer citizenship eligibility. As of this evening, IRCC has not responded to questions from CBC News, The Canadian Press, CP24, or other major outlets. No formal statement has been issued.
In a May 26, 2026 response tabled in the House of Commons, IRCC itself confirmed that where a formal birth certificate is unavailable, alternative evidence assessed on a balance of probabilities is acceptable β including hospital records, baptismal certificates, census records, and boat manifests. This statement, made weeks before the suspension letters were sent, directly contradicts the stated basis for the suspensions and is central to the legal challenge available to certificate holders.
CBC News broke the story on June 15. By June 16 it had been picked up by The Canadian Press, CP24, TechTimes, Narcity, immigration.ca and others. Experienced immigration lawyers quoted in national coverage β including attorneys with 38 years of practice β stated they have never seen anything like this. Multiple lawyers expect Federal Court judicial review applications to follow.
IRCC's own document checklist (CIT 0014, version 12-2025) expressly permits "any other evidence" of a parent's Canadian citizenship. The Federal Court held in Thompson v. Canada (2021 FC 914) that applicants are entitled to rely on IRCC's published guidance. This principle was reaffirmed in Somers-Edgar v. Canada (2026 FC 417) directly in the Bill C-3 context. Any cancellation must satisfy the reasonableness standard of Vavilov (2019 SCC 65). These are not abstract arguments β they are the foundation on which affected certificate holders can and should respond.
Do not surrender your certificate without first speaking with a licensed immigration attorney. Surrender does not resolve the underlying question of your entitlement.
Do not ignore the letter. You have the right to respond with additional documentary evidence. The time to build that response is now, not after a deadline passes.
You are almost certainly still a Canadian citizen. The suspension of a certificate is not a revocation of citizenship. The certificate must be returned if the review finds you are entitled.
A well-crafted legal response is your most powerful tool. Terry Preshaw is one of the only attorneys in the U.S. dual-licensed in both U.S. and Canadian immigration law and ready to act now.
One hour focused entirely on your suspension letter, your descent chain, your documents, and your response strategy. Appointments available this week.
Book Urgent Consultation βAssess your eligibility, review your family history, and chart a clear path to your Canadian citizenship certificate before the backlog grows further.
Book Standard Consultation βUntil recently, Canadian citizenship passed directly only to the first generation born outside Canada β meaning millions of people were cut off from their birthright. The Bjorkquist decision and the passage of Bill C-3 changed that permanently. If any of the following apply to you, you may have a claim worth exploring:
You may be entitled to Canadian citizenship by descent, even if you were born and raised entirely in the United States.
Bill C-3 abolished the first-generation limit retroactively. The chain of citizenship can now extend further than the old law ever allowed.
If you were assessed under the old rules, your situation deserves a fresh look. The law changed significantly in December 2025.
Historical exclusions under the old Citizenship Act have been addressed. Many previously ineligible individuals now have a clear path forward.
For decades, Canadian law limited citizenship by descent to a single generation born outside Canada. If your Canadian-born parent gave birth to you outside Canada, and you then had children abroad, those grandchildren were denied citizenship entirely. This was known as the "first-generation limit."
In December 2023, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice found that the first-generation limit violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms β creating unequal classes of Canadians based solely on where their parents were born.
Parliament responded with Bill C-3, which received Royal Assent on November 20, 2025, and came into force on December 15, 2025. For anyone born before that date who was excluded solely by the first-generation limit, citizenship is now recognized automatically β retroactively to birth. By operation of law, you were always Canadian. No test, no threshold.
For children born or adopted outside Canada on or after December 15, 2025 to a Canadian parent who was also born abroad, a new "substantial connection" test applies: the Canadian parent must demonstrate at least 1,095 cumulative days of physical presence in Canada before the child's birth or adoption.
In either case, you must apply to IRCC for a Canadian Certificate of Citizenship β the official document that serves as proof of your Canadian status. Professional guidance from an experienced attorney licensed in Canada will give you confidence in proceeding.
Terry T. Preshaw, J.D., has spent her entire career at the intersection of United States and Canadian immigration law. Based in Everett, Washington β just south of the border β she has guided individuals, families, and businesses through the complexities of cross-border legal status since 1985.
When Bill C-3 came into force in December 2025, Terry was ready. She had been following the Bjorkquist litigation closely, and immediately began helping clients assess and pursue their citizenship claims. She has organized community seminars, spoken with regional media, and built a caseload focused on this new wave of Canadian citizenship by descent.
She practices as a sole practitioner β which means when you book a consultation with Terry Preshaw, you speak with Terry Preshaw.
Canadian citizenship by descent is not self-executing β it requires a formal application to IRCC. Here is how Terry guides you through it.
A one-hour session to assess your eligibility, review your family history, identify the documents you need, and chart a clear path forward.
Terry guides you through the specific documentation IRCC requires β birth records, naturalization certificates, family history β and reviews everything before submission.
Terry prepares and submits your application, monitors its progress, and responds to any IRCC requests for additional information on your behalf.
Book a one-hour consultation with Terry T. Preshaw. Come with your family history and your questions. Leave with a clear picture of where you stand and what comes next.
Prefer email? [email protected]